Abstract
Mental health review tribunals (MHRTs) were established under the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1959 (UK) as one of the “main safeguards against improper admission under compulsory powers” and “unduly protracted detention”. In the United Kingdom a draft Mental Health Bill was published in June 2002. It proposed a new legal framework for the compulsory treatment and detention of people defined as mentally disordered. The mental health review tribunal is to be replaced by a new mental health tribunal. Although the aim of the new tribunal — the mental health tribunal — remains the same, there are some fundamental differences in the way in which the tribunal will operate. In this article the author uses the findings from previous research on decision-making in mental health review tribunals to assess the nature of the proposed tribunal reforms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
