Abstract
Background Suture anchor and bone tunnel fixations are used for distal biceps tendon repairs and have not been compared. Hypothesis Suture anchor fixation is equal or superior to bone tunnel fixation. Study Design Randomized controlled in vitro study. Methods A new fixation technique was compared to traditional bone tunnel fixation of distal biceps tendon ruptures between randomly selected sides of nine matched-pair, fresh-frozen elbow specimens from cadaveric donors (mean age = 74.7 years). Bone densities were determined. The distal biceps tendon was attached to the actuator of a servohydraulic load frame and loaded to tensile failure at a constant rate of 4 mm/sec. Bone density, sex, age, side, tuberosity area, repair, failure type, repair stiffness, and yield strength were compared. Results Superior yield strength of suture anchor fixation (263 N) compared to bone tunnel fixation (203 N) (P= 0.0233) were demonstrated. When suture anchor fixation failure (1 of 9) occurred, the matched pair also failed. Conclusion Suture anchor fixation offers an equal if not superior alternative to bone tunnel fixation for repair of the distal biceps tendon in the specimens tested. Clinical Relevance Suture anchor fixation may be used for distal biceps tendon repairs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
