Abstract

To report a new patient friendly and convenient technique for phrenic nerve conduction with alternative sites of stimulation and recording. Phrenic nerve conduction was performed in forty volunteers and ten patients of peripheral neuropathy. Active recording electrode was placed in tenth intercostal space 2.5 cm away from para-spinal muscles (mid-scapular line), reference electrode in eighth intercostal space just medial to subcostal margin with ground between stimulating and recording electrode. Stimulation was done at the level of crico-thyroid space near or under the posterior margin of sternocleidomastoid muscle. This new method was compared with existing ones. Data was analysed using SPSS 23 version. Correlation between height, weight, body mass index, age, and chest expansion was done using bi-variate correlation. Mean latency and amplitude of the study method were compared with other methods using MANNOVA test. Total of forty subjects were studied. Thirty-seven were male subjects. Mean age was 28.03 ± 9.63 years, height 168.0 ± 9.60 cm and chest expansion 3.53 ± 0.64 cm. Right sided phrenic nerve mean latency was 5.99 ± 0.629 ms and amplitude 1.088 ± 0.178 mV. Left sided phrenic nerve conductions showed mean latency of 6.02 ± 1.82 ms, amplitude of 1.092 ± 0.2912 mV. These standard deviations were smaller than what were observed with other methods suggesting increased consistency of our results. There was no correlation between phrenic nerve conduction with age, height, gender or chest expansion. This study method gave a better as well as consistent morphology, higher amplitude and required lower amount of current strength. It was superior to previously reported methods in consistency of normative data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call