Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy with CyberKnife for prostate cancer has long treatment times compared with conventional radiotherapy. This arises the need for designing treatment plans with short execution times. We propose an objective function for plan quality evaluation, which was used to determine an optimal combination between small and large collimators based on short treatment times and clinically acceptable dose distributions. Data from 11 prostate cancer patients were used. For each patient, 20 plans were created based on all combinations between one small (⌀ 10–25 mm) and one large (⌀ 35–60 mm) Iris collimator size. The objective function was assigned to each combination as a penalty, such that plans with low penalties were considered superior. This function considered the achievement of dosimetric planning goals, tumor control probability, normal tissue complication probability, relative seriality parameter, and treatment time. Two methods were used to determine the optimal combination. First, we constructed heat maps representing the mean penalty values and standard deviations of the plans created for each collimator combination. The combination giving a plan with the smallest mean penalty and standard deviation was considered optimal. Second, we created two groups of superior plans: group A plans were selected by histogram analysis and group B plans were selected by choosing the plan with the lowest penalty from each patient. In both groups, the most used small and large collimators were assumed to represent the optimal combination. The optimal combinations obtained from the heat maps included the 25 mm as a small collimator, giving small/large collimator sizes of 25/35, 25/40, 25/50, and 25/60 mm. The superior-group analysis indicated that 25/50 mm was the optimal combination. The optimal Iris combination for prostate cancer treatment using CyberKnife was determined to be a collimator size between 25 mm (small) and 50 mm (large).

Highlights

  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using CyberKnife (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is one of the methods of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer

  • The characteristics of CyberKnife allow for accurate delivery of high doses to planning target volumes (PTVs) and for the dose delivered to organs at risk (OARs) to be minimized

  • A moderate correlation was observed for the rectum normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (r = -0.524)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using CyberKnife (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is one of the methods of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Treatment with CyberKnife is usually hypofractionated, which is thought to be more effective for prostate cancer because the prostate has a lower α/β value—that is, the tumor or normal tissue-specific linear-quadratic parameter that measures a tissue’s sensitivity to fractionation [3]—than its surrounding organs (including the rectum, bladder, and urethra). This indicates that tumor cells are more sensitive to changes in the dose per fraction than normal tissue cells [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call