A new perspective of different schemes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Abstract

e18011 Background: To observe the clinical effect, survival time and toxicity and side effects in unoperated cervical cancer patients treated with different schemes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 120 patients who were followed up until they died or being followed up at least 5 years. The treatment schedules consisted of 2 cycles of intravenous paclitaxel 135-175 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 60-80mg/m2 (TP group, 62 patients) or lobaplatin 30mg/m2 (TL group, 58 patients) every 21 days. Patients were then submitted to CCRT. Chemotherapy regimen of CCRT was cisplatin 40 mg/m2 (TP group) or lobaplatin 30mg/m2 (TL group) weekly. External beam radiation therapy (total 50.4-56.35Gy, 28 fractions, 180-215cGy per fraction daily) was administered using the3D-CRT or IMRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy (5Gy per fractions, mostly 5 fractions, Ir192 based). Results: The proportion who had a complete/partial response was 81.7% after NACT, and 99.2% after all treatment. In all patients, the one-year, three-year and five-year survival rates were 99.2%, 81.7% and 69.2% respectively. In TP group vs. TL group, the 3-yr and 5-yr survival rates were 85.5% vs.77.6% (χ2= 1.248, p = 0.264) and 75.8% vs. 63.8% (χ2= 2.059, p = 0.151) with no significant difference. In mass size ≥ 5cm group vs. <5cm group, 3-yr survival rates were 88.0% vs.77.1% with no significant difference (χ2= 2.296, p = 0.130), but 5-yr survival rates were 82.0% vs.61.4% (χ2= 5.878, p = 0.015) with significant difference. The 3-yr and 5-yr OS rates between stage IIB and stage IIIB were not significantly different, respectively 83.1% vs. 70.6% (χ2= 2.083, p = 0.149) and 67.7% vs. 64.7% (χ2= 0.090, p = 0.765) . In TP group, grade 3 or 4 digestive reaction was obviously more frequent than TL group, respectively 54.3% vs. 1.8%(p = 0.000). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia are more common in TL group than TP group, respectively 48.3% vs. 30.6%(p = 0.0.048) and 44.8% vs. 1.6%(p = 0.000). Conclusions: For patients with severe digestive system reaction or contraindications of cisplatin, lobaplatin was might be used as an alternative drug. A prospective research is undergoing in our hospital. NACT may improve the prognosis of patients with large-scale mass. A undergoing prospective study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of hospital number 2017-02 and was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov as ChiCTR-IIR-17011559.