Abstract

With the increasing variety and quantity of end-of-life (EOL) products, the traditional disassembly process has become inefficient. In response to this phenomenon, this article proposes a random multiproduct U-shaped mixed-flow incomplete disassembly line balancing problem (MUPDLBP). MUPDLBP introduces a mixed disassembly method for multiple products and incomplete disassembly method into the traditional DLBP, while considering the characteristics of U-shaped disassembly lines and the uncertainty of the disassembly process. First, mixed-flow disassembly can improve the efficiency of disassembly lines, reducing factory construction and maintenance costs. Second, by utilizing the characteristics of incomplete disassembly to reduce the number of dismantled components and the flexibility and efficiency of U-shaped disassembly lines in allocating disassembly tasks, further improvement in disassembly efficiency can be achieved. In addition, this paper also addresses the characteristics of EOL products with heavy weight and high rigidity. While retaining the basic settings of MUPDLBP, the stability of the assembly during the disassembly process is considered, and a new problem called MUPDLBP_S, which takes into account the disassembly stability, is further proposed. The corresponding mathematical model is provided. To obtain high-quality disassembly plans, a new and improved algorithm called INSGAII is proposed. The INSGAII algorithm uses the initialization method based on Monte Carlo tree simulation (MCTI) and the Group Global Crowd Degree Comparison (GCDC) operator to replace the initialization method and crowding distance comparison operator in the NSGAII algorithm, effectively improving the coverage of the initial population individuals in the entire solution space and the evenness and spread of the Pareto front. Finally, INSGAII’s effectiveness has been affirmed by tackling both current disassembly line balancing problems and the proposed MUPDLBP and MUPDLBP_S. Importantly, INSGAII outshines six comparison algorithms with a top rank of 1 in the Friedman test, highlighting its superior performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.