A New, Noninvasive Method of Measuring Pulmonary Gas Exchange: Results in Normal Subjects and Patients with Lung Disease

Abstract

MethodsThe person breathes through a device that continually measures and displays the inspired and expired PO2 and PCO2. An oximeter is worn, and the arterial PO2 is calculated from the SpO2 and the oxygen dissociation curve, using the end–tidal PCO2 to account for the effect of PCO2 on the oxygen affinity of hemoglobin. The PO2 difference between the end‐tidal gas and the calculated arterial value is called the Oxygen Deficit. Since the calculation is only accurate when the arterial oxygen saturations are 94% or less, the normal subjects breathed 12.5% oxygen.ResultsStudies were made on 17 patients with a variety of pulmonary diseases who were attending an outpatient clinic. The mean oxygen deficit was 48.7 mm Hg, SE 3.1. This can be contrasted with a mean oxygen deficit of 4.0 mm Hg, SE 0.91 in a group of 30 normal subjects who were previously studied. The p value for the difference between the two groups was < 0.0001. Within the normal subjects, the mean oxygen deficit for the 19 younger participants (ages 22–31) was 2.02 mm Hg, SE 0.84 while that in the 11 older participants (ages 47–88) was 7.53 mm Hg, SE 1.55. The p value for the difference between the young and old groups was 0.0015. The mean oxygen deficit in younger normal subjects is remarkably small. This implies that there is very little difference between the calculated arterial PO2 and the alveolar PO2, consistent with little impairment of gas exchange. However, the mean oxygen deficit in older normal subjects is significantly higher consistent with the increased Alveolar‐arterial (A‐a) PO2 gradient with age, which has been well documented in the literature. Analysis of the factors determining the magnitude of the oxygen deficit showed that the end–tidal PO2 was the most important factor, followed by the end–tidal PCO2, and the calculated arterial PO2. Interestingly the SpO2 had a minor influence in spite of the fact that the oximeter reading is frequently used to guide therapy. The analysis emphasizes the value of measuring the composition of alveolar gas in determining ventilation‐perfusion ratio inequality. Remarkably, this factor is largely ignored in the classical index of impaired pulmonary gas exchange using the ideal alveolar PO2 to calculate the A‐a O2 gradient. We argue that ignoring the actual alveolar value gives an incomplete picture of gas exchange in the lungs because the traditional index is heavily biased by lung units with low ventilation‐perfusion ratios. Therefore, by using the new index of oxygen deficit, we derive a more comprehensive measurement of gas exchange in the lungs.Support or Funding InformationSupported by MediPines IncThis abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.