Abstract

The new noninvasive finger sensor system NICCI (Getinge; Gothenburg, Sweden) allows continuous cardiac output monitoring. We aimed to investigate its cardiac output measurement performance. To investigate the NICCI system's cardiac output measurement performance. Prospective method comparison study. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Fifty-one patients after cardiac surgery. We performed a method comparison study in 51 patients after cardiac surgery to compare NICCI cardiac output (CO NICCI ) and NICCI cardiac output calibrated to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output measurement (CO NICCI-CAL ) with pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (CO PAT ). As a secondary analysis we also compared CNAP cardiac output (CO CNAP ) and externally calibrated CNAP cardiac output (CO CNAP-CAL ) with CO PAT . We analysed 299 cardiac output measurement pairs. The mean of the differences (95% limits of agreement) between CO NICCI and CO PAT was 0.6 (-1.8 to 3.1) l min -1 with a percentage error of 48%. The mean of the differences between CO NICCI-CAL and CO PAT was -0.4 (-1.9 to 1.1) l min -1 with a percentage error of 29%. The mean of the differences between CO CNAP and CO PAT was 1.0 (-1.8 to 3.8) l min -1 with a percentage error of 53%. The mean of the differences between CO CNAP-CAL and CO PAT was -0.2 (-2.0 to 1.6) l min -1 with a percentage error of 35%. The agreement between CO NICCI and CO PAT is not clinically acceptable. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00023189) after inclusion of the first patient on October 2, 2020.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call