Abstract

Background: Commonly used flow-cytometric methods for immunophenotyping are based on erythrocyte lysing reagents. It is known from the literature that these reagents result in a significant loss of leucocytes caused by membrane destruction. Although the dual-platform method should compensate this phenomenon, the subset-specific individual differences in sensitivity to lysing reagents lead to incorrect values. In order to overcome this problem we introduce a no-lyse, no-wash procedure in combination with absolute true volumetric counting (TVC) for the enumeration of CD4 T cells. Material and Methods: Whole-blood samples of 50 blood donors and 20 samples of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were treated with both a lyse, no-wash and a nolyse, no-wash procedure. Then, CD4 T cells were counted with a TVC flow cytometer (CyFlow Counter). 30 blood samples of blood donors were treated with a lyse and wash protocol and measured by the CyFlow Counter and FACS-Calibur system (reference method). A new gating strategy was used for the data analysis for both, the lyse and no-lyse method and compared to the traditional gating procedure. Results: The TVC method showed a good reproducibility for both, the lyse (CV 1.9%) and the no-lyse procedure (CV 1.5%). CD4 counts measured by the no-lyse procedure are on average 10% higher than by using the lysing protocol. The comparison of the CyFlow Counter and FACS-Calibur results showed a correlation of r = 0.961. The simplified gating strategy shows a good correlation to the traditional gating procedure (r = 0.998). Conclusion: Erythrocyte lysing procedures cause substantial cell loss with individual values for every single subclass and patient. Therefore, the use of a no-lyse procedure is recommended. The new gating strategy is fully comparable to the traditional one and simplifies enumeration of CD4 T cells. Using the no-lyse procedure in combination with the new gating strategy, it is possible to reduce the costs per sample from EUR 30.– to below EUR 2.–.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call