Abstract

The use of statistical tools for predicting the winner in tennis matches has enjoyed an increase in popularity over the last two decades and, currently, a variety of methods are available. In particular, paired comparison approaches make use of latent ability estimates or rating calculations to determine the probability that a player will win a match. In this paper, we extend this latter class of models by using network indicators for the predictions. We propose a measure based on eigenvector centrality. Unlike what happens for the standard paired comparisons class (where the rates or latent abilities only change at time t for those players involved in the matches at time t), the use of a centrality measure allows the ratings of the whole set of players to vary every time there is a new match. The resulting ratings are then used as a covariate in a simple logit model. Evaluating the proposed approach with respect to some popular competing specifications, we find that the centrality-based approach largely and consistently outperforms all the alternative models considered in terms of the prediction accuracy. Finally, the proposed method also achieves positive betting results.

Highlights

  • The advent of big data has significantly favoured the application of statistical tools in sports

  • By means of a particular network that incorporates a temporal memory of the matches, we propose a new measure based on the directed version of the eigenvector centrality, the so-called Bonacich centrality (Bonacich and Lloyd 2001)

  • In the big data era, statistical methods are increasingly used to predict the outcomes of sporting events

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The advent of big data has significantly favoured the application of statistical tools in sports. In the literature aimed at predicting the outcomes of sporting events, soccer (Koopman and Lit 2015; Angelini and De Angelis 2017; Mattera 2021, among others) and tennis play a prominent role Regarding the latter, Kovalchik (2016) identifies three main categories of statistical methods used to forecast the winner of the match, namely regression-based (see, for instance, Del Corral and Prieto-Rodriguez 2010; Lisi and Zanella 2017), point-based (Barnett and Clarke 2005; Knottenbelt et al 2012, among others), and paired comparisons (like the Bradley-Terry-type model of McHale and Morton 2011) approaches. Paired comparison methods seem to provide consistently better forecasts than other models (as reported, for instance, by Kovalchik 2016, 2020; Angelini et al 2022), they have a not insignificant drawback–the latent ability, defined rating, of players is calculated before each match.

A network approach for players ratings
Empirical analysis
Application of the centrality-based measure
Competing models for the winning probabilities
Statistical evaluation
Economic evaluation: betting opportunities
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call