Abstract

BackgroundThe aim is to describe a new arthroscopically assisted Latarjet technique.MethodsWe evaluated the clinical and radiological findings of 60 patients with chronic recurrent anterior gleno-humeral instability who underwent, between September 2013 and November 2014, an arthroscopically-assisted Latarjet procedure with double round endobutton fixation. Inclusion criteria were: chronic anterior recurrent instability, Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) greater than three points, a glenoid bone defect > 15% or a Hill Sachs lesion with concomitant glenoid bone defect > 10%. During surgery the joint capsule and the anterior glenoid labrum were detached. Two drill tunnels perpendicular to the neck of the glenoid were made through a guide. An accessible pilot hole through the glenoid was created to allows the passage of guidewires for coracoid guidance and final fixation onto the anterior glenoid. Through a restricted deltopectoral access a coracoid osteotomy was made. Finally, the graft was prepared, inserted and secured using half-stitches.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 32.5 months (range 24–32 months). At a mean follow-up, 56 of the 60 subjects claimed a stable shoulder without postoperative complaints, two (3.3%) had an anterior dislocation after new traumatic injury, and two (3.3%) complained of subjective instability. At the latest follow-up, four subjects complained of painful recurrent anterior instability during abduction-external rotation with apprehension. At 1 year, the graft had migrated in one patient (1.7%) and judged not healed and high positioned in another patient (1.7%). Moreover, a glenoid bony gain of 26.3% was recorded. At the latest follow-up, three patients had grade 1 according to Samilson and Prieto classification asymptomatic degenerative changes. Nerve injuries and infections were not detected. None of the 60 patients underwent revision surgery. Healing rate of the graft was 96.7%.ConclusionsThis technique of arthroscopically assisted Latarjet combines mini-open and arthroscopic approach for improving the precision of the bony tunnels in the glenoid and coracoid placement, minimizing any potential risk of neurologic complications. It can be an option in subjects with anterior gleno-humeral instability and glenoid bone defect. Further studies should be performed to confirm our preliminary results.Trial registrationTrial registration number 61/int/2017Name of registry: ORSDate of registration 11.5.2017Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: September 2013 ‘retrospectively registered’Level of evidenceIV

Highlights

  • The aim is to describe a new arthroscopically assisted Latarjet technique

  • We propose a combined mini-open and arthroscopic approach for improving the precision of the osseous tunnels in the glenoid and the coracoid placement, minimizing any potential risk of neurologic complications

  • This study aims to describe an arthroscopically assisted Latarjet, which combines a mini-open and arthroscopic approach for improving the precision of the osseous tunnels in the glenoid and the coracoid placement, minimizing any potential risk of neurologic complications for subjects with glenoid bone deficiency and anterior instability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim is to describe a new arthroscopically assisted Latarjet technique. The Latarjet procedure is a popular procedure to manage recurrent shoulder instability [1].Recently, the arthroscopic technique has been applied to the Latarjet procedure [2,3,4]. The aim is to describe a new arthroscopically assisted Latarjet technique. The Latarjet procedure is a popular procedure to manage recurrent shoulder instability [1]. The arthroscopic technique has been applied to the Latarjet procedure [2,3,4]. Concerns arise from the technical challenges of arthroscopy, which may cause an elevated incidence of complications [5, 6]. Despite the excellent and reproducible results of the Latarjet procedure in terms of stability, the incidence of complications Nerve damage) is around 15% in open Latarjet [7, 8]. The arthroscopic procedure requires more time and higher costs [8,9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call