Abstract

Elastic strain engineering is an important strategy to design material properties in semiconductor and emerging advanced manufacturing industries. Recently, peak-pair method has drawn great attention compared to geometric phase analysis, owing to its precise determination of atom position at real space. Most current strain characterization methods estimate the local strain by comparing it with the related information from unstrained areas as reference. However, peak-pair method generated large errors in some cases because of the complexity of lower symmetric crystal structures, such as hexagonal structure. In this study, we introduce a new algorithm to overcome this limitation by directly comparing the atom positions with multiple references with different lattice symmetries. Furthermore, this new method is validated through several complicated crystal systems such as hexagonal, orthorhombic, monoclinic, and tetragonal structure, and returns expected values. This finding is essential to reliably determine the localized elastic strain with various crystal structures.

Highlights

  • Elastic strain engineering is an important strategy to design material properties in semiconductor and emerging advanced manufacturing industries

  • digital image correlation (DIC) is based on optical microscope (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging techniques and the resolution can be up to sub-micro with advanced speckling techniques and algorithms[17,18]

  • Both geometric phase based method (GP) and peak-pair based methods (PP) methods are based on the high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR(S)TEM) images with the atomic resolution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Elastic strain engineering is an important strategy to design material properties in semiconductor and emerging advanced manufacturing industries. Horizontal (h) and vertical (v) lattice parameters are defined in the unit cell (top left) to classify the atoms into different layers. Since the built lattice is unstrained, this large strain value is definitely erroneous due to the mismatch of the reference and the calculated atom layer.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call