Abstract

In the numerous low-permeability reservoirs, knowing the real productivity of the reservoir became one of the most important steps in its exploitation. However, the value of permeability interpreted by a conventional well-test method is far lower than logging, which further leads to an inaccurate skin factor. This skin factor cannot match the real production situation and will mislead engineer to do an inappropriate development strategy of the oilfield. In order to solve this problem, key parameters affecting the skin factor need to be found. Based on the real core experiment and digital core experiment results, stress sensitivity and threshold pressure gradient are verified to be the most influential factors in the production of low-permeability reservoirs. On that basis, instead of a constant skin factor, a well-test interpretation mathematical model is established by defining and using a time-varying skin factor. The time-varying skin factor changes with the change of stress sensitivity and threshold pressure gradient. In this model, the Laplace transform is used to solve the Laplace space solution, and the Stehfest numerical inversion is used to calculate the real space solution. Then, the double logarithmic chart of dimensionless borehole wall pressure and pressure derivative changing with dimensionless time is drawn. The influences of parameters in expressions including stress sensitivity, threshold pressure, and variable skin factor on pressure and pressure derivative and productivity are analyzed, respectively. At last, the method is applied to the well-test interpretation of low-permeability oil fields in the eastern South China Sea. The interpretation results turn out to be reasonable and can truly reflect the situation of low-permeability reservoirs, which can give guidance to the rational development of low-permeability reservoirs.

Highlights

  • As the exploration of oil and gas gets deeper, the scale of proven reserves in offshore low-permeability oilfields gets larger and larger

  • Due to the stress sensitivity effect and threshold pressure gradient in low-permeability reservoirs [1,2,3], the current research on the theory and application of seepage flow in offshore low-permeability oil reservoirs has limitation, including two common features: (i) as the two variables, stress sensitivity effect and threshold pressure gradient, both have big influences on seepage, most models only consider one of them as factor; (ii) in order to prevent the blowout, using of the mud with high density in offshore drilling and mud pollution caused by this method is not taken into consideration in most models

  • In order to further analyze the influence of the three factors of threshold pressure gradient, stress sensitivity, and mud pollution and to study reasonably mathematical representation methods, this paper first uses the offshore low-permeability core experiment to study the expressions of stress sensitivity and threshold pressure gradient

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As the exploration of oil and gas gets deeper, the scale of proven reserves in offshore low-permeability oilfields gets larger and larger. The author established the mathematical model of unsteady seepage in offshore low-permeability oilfield by using the law of conservation of mass and Laplace transform It is developed considering the influences of threshold pressure gradient and stress sensitivity and considering the influence of mud pollution in the actual seepage process of offshore low permeability. In order to further analyze the influence of the three factors of threshold pressure gradient, stress sensitivity, and mud pollution and to study reasonably mathematical representation methods, this paper first uses the offshore low-permeability core experiment to study the expressions of stress sensitivity and threshold pressure gradient. The experimental results of each core are fitted based on the nonlinear seepage model equation, the slope of the straight line segment is the permeability, and the intercept is the threshold pressure gradient.

Experimental results Non linear model
Application
Conclusion
Model Derivation
Derivation of Threshold Pressure Gradient
Conflicts of Interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call