Abstract

In the R 1− x D x MnO 3 ( x ∼0.5) manganites, the structural phase transition at T CO is commonly interpreted as a concomitant charge and orbital ordering (CO/OO) process driven by a co-operative Jahn–Teller effect and Coulomb repulsion forces. The low-temperature phase is supposed to contain well-separated and ordered Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ ionic species in an NaCl-like pattern. Structure refinement, from a neutron diffraction experiment below T CO on a Pr 0.6 Ca 0.4 MnO 3 single crystal, gives us a model for the displacement of atoms with respect to the high-temperature phase that invalidates the standard model based in the CO/OO picture. Our result is a non-centrosymmetric crystal structure with two non-equivalent MnO 6 octahedra, both being slightly elongated but displaying very similar average Mn–O distances (1.96 and 1.95 Å, respectively) and having off-centered Mn atoms. We argue that this is a proof of the absence of charge ordering in half-doped manganites in the sense of formation of separated Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ ionic species. A new qualitative interpretation of the CE-type spin ordering (SO) is proposed. The so-called CO transition is, in fact, a structural transition induced by the change in the mean free path of electrons that continue to be thermally activated below T CO by forming ferromagnetic Mn–Mn pairs stabilized by a local double-exchange process. The CE SO pattern results from the ordering of these pairs formed at T CO . High-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction shows a complex anisotropic/asymmetric strains appearing at the transition that can be phenomenologically fitted by additional phases. Complementary electron diffraction and microscopy have shown no trace of macroscopic phase separation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call