Abstract

Abstract. High-resolution numerical models can be effective in monitoring and predicting natural hazards, especially when dealing with Mediterranean atmospheric and marine intense/severe events characterised by a wide range of interacting scales. The understanding of the key factors associated to these Mediterranean phenomena, and the usefulness of adopting high-resolution numerical models in their simulation, are among the aims of the international initiative HyMeX – HYdrological cycle in Mediterranean EXperiment. At the turn of 2013, two monitoring campaigns (SOPs – Special Observation Periods) were devoted to these issues. For this purpose, a new high-resolution BOlogna Limited Area Model-MOdello LOCale (BOLAM-MOLOCH) suite was implemented in the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) hydro–meteo–marine forecasting system (SIMM – Sistema Idro-Meteo-Mare) as a possible alternative to the operational meteorological component based on the BOLAM model self-nested over two lower-resolution domains. The present paper provides an assessment of this new configuration of SIMM with respect to the operational one that was also used during the two SOPs. More in details, it investigates the forecast performance of these SIMM configurations during two of the Intense Observation Periods (IOPs) declared in the first SOP campaign. These IOPs were characterised by high precipitations and very intense and exceptional high waters over the northern Adriatic Sea (acqua alta). Concerning the meteorological component, the high-resolution BOLAM-MOLOCH forecasts are compared against the lower-resolution BOLAM forecasts over three areas – mostly corresponding to the Italian HyMeX hydrometeorological sites – using the rainfall observations collected in the HyMeX database. Three-month categorical scores are also calculated for the MOLOCH model. Despite the presence of a slight positive bias of the MOLOCH model, the results show that the precipitation forecast turns out to improve with increasing resolution. In both SIMM configurations, the sea storm surge component is based on the same version of the Shallow water HYdrodynamic Finite Element Model (SHYFEM). Hence, it is evaluated the impact of the meteorological forcing provided by the two adopted BOLAM configurations on the SHYFEM forecasts for six tide-gauge stations. A benchmark for this part of the study is given by the performance of the SHYFEM model forced by the ECMWF IFS forecast fields. For this component, both BOLAM-SHYFEM configurations clearly outperform the benchmark. The results are, however, strongly affected by the predictability of the weather systems associated to the IOPs, thus suggesting the opportunity to develop and test a time-lagged multi-model ensemble for the prediction of high storm surge events.

Highlights

  • Forecast verification is an essential activity of any operational institution or centre that arise from the need to constantly assess the skill and value of the forecasts provided by numerical models

  • Evaluating the performance of an integrated meteo-marine modelling system, such as Sistema Idro-Meteo-Mare (SIMM), is a demanding task since forecasts have to be verified at any model stage, and the results should be inter-related to provide a whole picture of the system skill and value

  • Despite an apparent similarity of weather patterns and surface effects, the IOP16 and IOP18 events are characterised by different predictability: the results indicate that the cyclone responsible for the latter event is much less predictable than that involved in the former one

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forecast verification is an essential activity of any operational institution or centre (dealing with numerical predictions) that arise from the need to constantly assess the skill and value of the forecasts provided by numerical models (see, e.g., Jolliffe and Stephenson, 2011). An ad hoc forecasting activity (Ducrocq et al, 2014; Ferretti et al, 2014) based on several numerical model forecasts was set up during each SOP to identify in advance the Intense Observation Periods (IOPs) to be monitored For this specific activity, the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) provided the meteorological products of its operational hydro–meteo–marine forecasting system called. The two IOPs are used to test the improvement, if any, in replacing the lower-resolution BOLAM configuration with the new higherresolution BOLAM-MOLOCH suite, and to assess the performance of the SIMM storm-surge forecasting component, namely the Shallow water HYdrodynamic Finite Element Model (SHYFEM, Umgiesser et al, 2004; Bajo et al, 2007; Zampato et al, 2007).

The operational SIMM
The HyMeX-based SIMM
The HyMeX IOP16 and IOP18: synoptic analysis and ground effects
Forecast verification and model intercomparison
Statistical assessment
Case studies
Tidal forecast
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.