Abstract

BackgroundIn addition to component-based comparative approaches, network alignments provide the means to study conserved network topology such as common pathways and more complex network motifs. Yet, unlike in classical sequence alignment, the comparison of networks becomes computationally more challenging, as most meaningful assumptions instantly lead to NP-hard problems. Most previous algorithmic work on network alignments is heuristic in nature.ResultsWe introduce the graph-based maximum structural matching formulation for pairwise global network alignment. We relate the formulation to previous work and prove NP-hardness of the problem.Based on the new formulation we build upon recent results in computational structural biology and present a novel Lagrangian relaxation approach that, in combination with a branch-and-bound method, computes provably optimal network alignments. The Lagrangian algorithm alone is a powerful heuristic method, which produces solutions that are often near-optimal and – unlike those computed by pure heuristics – come with a quality guarantee.ConclusionComputational experiments on the alignment of protein-protein interaction networks and on the classification of metabolic subnetworks demonstrate that the new method is reasonably fast and has advantages over pure heuristics. Our software tool is freely available as part of the LISA library.

Highlights

  • In addition to component-based comparative approaches, network alignments provide the means to study conserved network topology such as common pathways and more complex network motifs

  • We define the global pairwise network alignment problem and present a graph-theoretical reformulation, which is an extension of the maximum weight trace formulation, which has been proposed by Kececioglu for classical sequence alignment [14]

  • Contribution In this paper, we introduce the maximum structural matching formulation for global network alignment and show its relation to the global alignment graph

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In addition to component-based comparative approaches, network alignments provide the means to study conserved network topology such as common pathways and more complex network motifs. Unlike in classical sequence alignment, the comparison of networks becomes computationally more challenging, as most meaningful assumptions instantly lead to NPhard problems. Based on the assumption that evolutionary conservation implies functional significance, comparative approaches may help improve the accuracy of data, elucidate protein pathways and complexes, generate, investigate, and validate hypotheses about the underlying networks, and transfer functional annotations. Unlike in classical sequence alignment, the comparison of networks becomes (page number not for citation purposes)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.