Abstract

We present a glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model for Antarctica. This is driven by a new deglaciation history that has been developed using a numerical ice-sheet model, and is constrained to fit observations of past ice extent. We test the sensitivity of the GIA model to uncertainties in the deglaciation history, and seek earth model parameters that minimize the misfit of model predictions to relative sea-level observations from Antarctica. We find that the relative sea-level predictions are fairly insensitive to changes in lithospheric thickness and lower mantle viscosity, but show high sensitivity to changes in upper mantle viscosity and constrain this value (95 per cent confidence) to lie in the range 0.8–2.0 × 1021 Pa s. Significant misfits at several sites may be due to errors in the deglaciation history, or unmodelled effects of lateral variations in Earth structure. When we compare our GIA model predictions with elastic corrected GPS uplift rates we find that the predicted rates are biased high (weighted mean bias = 1.8mm yr–1) and there is a weighted root-mean-square (WRMS) error of 2.9mm yr–1. In particular, our model systematically over-predicts uplift rates in the Antarctica Peninsula, and we attempt to address this by adjusting the Late Holocene loading history in this region, within the bounds of uncertainty of the deglaciation model. Using this adjusted model the weighted mean bias improves from 1.8 to 1.2mm yr–1, and the WRMS error is reduced to 2.3mm yr–1, compared with 4.9mm yr–1 for ICE-5G v1.2 and 5.0mm yr–1 for IJ05. Finally, we place spatially variable error bars on our GIA uplift rate predictions, taking into account uncertainties in both the deglaciation history and modelled Earth viscosity structure. This work provides a new GIA correction for the GRACE data in Antarctica, thus permitting more accurate constraints to be placed on current ice-mass change.

Highlights

  • Recent advances in the field of Antarctic glacial geology have generated renewed interest in reconstructing the past extent of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS; Whitehouse et al 2012, and references therein)

  • Four groups of experiments are carried out: using the W12 deglaciation model, the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model is calibrated by seeking the earth model that provides the best fit to the relative sea-level (RSL) data

  • (1) We present a new GIA model for Antarctica, which is driven by a new deglaciation history that has been developed using a numerical ice-sheet model and tuned to fit observations of ice extent since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent advances in the field of Antarctic glacial geology have generated renewed interest in reconstructing the past extent of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS; Whitehouse et al 2012, and references therein). These advances are not reflected in existing glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) models and new models are required. GIA model output is largely governed by two inputs; the global ice-loading history and the rheology of the Earth The former uniquely describes global changes in surface loading via solutions to the sea-level equation (Farrell & Clark 1976), while the latter dictates the response of the Earth to these changes in surface loading. The recent availability of new field constraints from Antarctica has improved our ability to constrain these key inputs

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call