Abstract

In this paper, a novel experimental method, i.e., the dynamic fluid-flow (DFF) method, was developed to measure the bubble-point pressures of the light crude oil–CO2 system at different CO2 concentrations at the actual reservoir temperature. The measured bubble-point pressures were compared with and validated by the measured data from the conventional static constant-composition-expansion (CCE) tests. First, a series of the CCE tests were conducted by using a pressure–volume–temperature (PVT) system to measure the bubble-point pressures of the light crude oil–CO2 system at seven different CO2 concentrations. Second, a series of new DFF tests were undertaken to measure the pressure gradients along a micro-tubing at different pre-specified outlet pressures when a given light crude oil–CO2 mixture was injected at a constant volume flow rate. It was found in the DFF test that the pressure gradient along the micro-tubing was an excellent indicator to identify the related phase changes and that it could be used to measure the bubble-point pressure. More specifically, the pressure gradient remained small and almost constant if the outlet pressure was above the bubble-point pressure of the light crude oil–CO2 mixture. However, the pressure gradient started to increase once the outlet pressure was below the to-be-measured bubble-point pressure. The outlet pressure, where a slope change occurred, was determined to be the bubble-point pressure of the light crude oil–CO2 mixture. It was also found that the measured bubble-point pressure of a given light crude oil–CO2 mixture from the DFF test was close to but slightly lower than that measured from the CCE test due to the gas-bubble re-entrainment and micro-tubing confinement in the former test. In addition, the phase change was found to occur near the outlet of the micro-tubing even if the outlet pressure was far below the bubble-point pressure. Furthermore, the micro-tubing length and the light crude oil–CO2 mixture injection rate in the ranges tested in this study did not noticeably affect the measured bubble-point pressure from the DFF test. In summary, the newly developed dynamic experimental method based on the DFF tests is much more time-saving and cost-effective, and easier to use, in comparison with the conventional static CCE tests by using an expensive and large PVT system.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.