Abstract
Hang’s mudding-off technique is a well control measure used to maintain the dynamic balance of the pressure inside a well and thus ensure safe operation when there is circulation loss in the return. Given the lack of a dynamic analysis method that reflects the principles of annulus liquid level changes in a well shaft, there has been no analytical basis for applying Hang’s mudding-off technique in practice, and as a result, the technique is typically applied as a “blind Hang”. In this study, a dynamic analysis method was employed to model well shaft leakage loss, based on actual engineering conditions under which Hang’s mudding-off technique is used, and models were developed for the effective height of the well shaft annulus liquid level in Hang’s mudding-off technique and for a safe operation time after the application of the technique. The calculation of variations in the cross-sectional area of the annulus was also addressed. The reliability of the proposed models was evaluated using calculation examples. The error in the calculated effective liquid level height was 1.22% when dynamic leakage loss was considered, and the error in the safe operation time calculation was 3.58%. These results illustrate the accuracy of the models. The analysis method proposed in this paper can be used to solve problems related to calculation of the engineering parameters involved in Hang’s mudding-off technique and averting the risks of well control safety under conditions of circulation loss in the return, thereby optimising Hang’s mudding-off technique and reducing project costs.
Highlights
Loss of circulation often occurs when drilling oil and gas wells and can lead to well control safety risks in the most serious cases (Lin, 1983; Dyke et al, 1995; Li et al, 2009; Jia et al, 2014)
A dynamic analysis method was employed to model well shaft leakage loss, based on actual engineering conditions under which Hang’s mudding-off technique is used, and models were developed for the effective height of the well shaft annulus liquid level in Hang’s mudding-off technique and for the safe operation time after application of Hang’s mudding-off technique
These results show that the model for the effective height of the well shaft annulus liquid level has good calculation accuracy
Summary
Loss of circulation often occurs when drilling oil and gas wells and can lead to well control safety risks in the most serious cases (Lin, 1983; Dyke et al, 1995; Li et al, 2009; Jia et al, 2014). A dynamic analysis method was employed to model well shaft leakage loss, based on actual engineering conditions under which Hang’s mudding-off technique is used, and models were developed for the effective height of the well shaft annulus liquid level in Hang’s mudding-off technique and for the safe operation time after application of Hang’s mudding-off technique. The error in the calculated effective liquid level height was 1.22% when dynamic leakage loss was considered, and the error in the safe operation time calculation was 3.58% These results illustrate the accuracy of the models. The analysis method proposed in this paper can be used to solve problems related to calculation of the engineering parameters involved in Hang’s mudding-off technique and averting the risks of well control safety under conditions of circulation loss in the return, thereby optimising Hang’s mudding-off technique and reducing project costs. Model for effective height of well shaft annulus liquid level in Hang’s mudding-off technique
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have