Abstract

To assess a new method of determining functional impairment in patients with intermittent claudication, the Double Physiological Walking Test (DPWT) using the PADHOC (Peripheral Arterial Disease Holter Control) device, against a standard treadmill test. Patients with intermittent claudication presenting to the department were considered for both the DPWT and a standard treadmill test. initial claudicating distance, maximal walking distance and speed of walking were determined for both parts of the DPWT. Initial claudicating distance and maximal walking distance were determined from the treadmill test. Comparisons were made between the treadmill test and the DPWT. The treadmill test was unable to be performed in 22% of patients due to defined contraindications. There were strong correlations in both walking distances and disease severity when comparing the DPWT and the treadmill test. Patients in whom the treadmill test was contraindicated had significantly shorter walking distances on the DPWT than those who were able to complete a treadmill walking test. The DPWT correlates strongly with walking distances obtained from a standard treadmill test. However, the PADHOC can be used in a number of differing locations and settings as well as in patients in whom a treadmill test is contraindicated. It therefore has a role to play in the initial assessment of patients presenting with intermittent claudication.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call