Abstract

Preference aggregation in Group Decision Making (GDM) is a substantial problem that has received a lot of research attention. Decision problems involving fuzzy preference relations constitute an important class within GDM. Legacy approaches dealing with the latter type of problems can be classified into indirect approaches, which involve deriving a group preference matrix as an intermediate step, and direct approaches, which deduce a group preference ranking based on individual preference rankings. Although the work on indirect approaches has been extensive in the literature, there is still a scarcity of research dealing with the direct approaches. In this paper we present a direct approach towards aggregating several fuzzy preference relations on a set of alternatives into a single weighted ranking of the alternatives. By mapping the pairwise preferences into transitions probabilities, we are able to derive a preference ranking from the stationary distribution of a stochastic matrix. Interestingly, the ranking of the alternatives obtained with our method corresponds to the optimizer of the Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a particular Bradley-Terry-Luce model. Furthermore, we perform a theoretical sensitivity analysis of the proposed method supported by experimental results and illustrate our approach towards GDM with a concrete numerical example. This work opens avenues for solving GDM problems using elements of probability theory, and thus, provides a sound theoretical fundament as well as plausible statistical interpretation for the aggregation of expert opinions in GDM.

Highlights

  • Group decision making (GDM) settings involve a group of individuals, where each member of the group expresses her preferences over a set of alternatives

  • We propose a method for aggregating the opinions of several experts, which are expressed as Fuzzy Preference Relation (FPR), into a single weighted ranking of the alternatives

  • We prove that the weighted ranking obtained as a result of the method presented in this paper corresponds to the result of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) of the Plackett-Luce model (Plackett, 1975)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Group decision making (GDM) settings involve a group of individuals (experts), where each member of the group expresses her preferences over a set of alternatives. The indirect approaches first compute the group opinion in the form of an FPR (we will call it a group or a collective FPR), usually expressed as a preference matrix, and find a solution which is a (weighted) ranking of the different alternatives based on the collective FPR. The difference is that the normalization we use leads to a stationary vector that satisfies the global balance property with respect to the preference matrix: the preference strength of an alternative depends on whether the alternative dominates weak or strong alternatives

Background and preliminary concepts
A rank centrality-based preference aggregation method
From preference matrices to ranking vectors
The GDM method
The detailed balance case
Testing GDM with FPR: numerical experiments
A numerical example
Experimental sensitivity analysis
Findings
Conclusions and future work

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.