Abstract
Traditional CAM algorithms evaluate the cutting error only based on the geometry of the sculptured surfaces. The kinematic parameters, such as rotational angles, machine structure, and tool geometry, are not considered until the post‐processing stage. When using the tool paths generated by traditional algorithms, the corresponding cutting errors may be larger than expected due to rotation. Therefore, the estimation algorithm presented in this paper considers not only surface geometry but also kinematic parameters. Compared to traditional CAM algorithms, simulation results show that the step lengths are varied adaptively, and cutting errors are reduced.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
