Abstract
Many human activities, such as ore mining and smeltering, sewage sludge treatment and fossil fuel consumption, result in toxic soil concentrations of ‘heavy metals’ (Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Ti, Zn and others) (Gadd, 1993). There are also natural soils, such as serpentine, with levels of heavy metals that inhibit or preclude the growth of many plants and soil micro‐organisms. However, certain plants and microorganisms do grow in these metalliferous sites. Understanding the physiology, ecology and evolution of tolerance to elevated soil metal concentrations is important in an applied setting, and is also of interest in theoretical biology. Applied importance relates to the improvement of forest health in areas subject to increasing pollution, rehabilitation of severely polluted sites by phytostabilization of metals, and metal removal using hyperaccumulating plants (Krämer, 2000; Ernst, 2000). Areas of theoretical interest include the evolution of local adaptation (Sork et al., 1993) and how it is shaped by the combined influences of natural selection, gene flow and genetic architecture, as well as metal influences on various species interactions (Pollard, 2000). A paper appears on pages 367–379 in this issue by Jan Colpaert and coworkers which adroitly combines the disparate fields of physiology, genetics and ecology to answer several outstanding questions concerning heavy metal tolerance in mycorrhizal fungi.Mycorrhizal fungi, which interact mutualistically with the majority of plant species, are well known for improving the P status of their hosts (Smith & Read, 1997). Some mycorrhizal fungi are also able to mobilize N and P from organic substrates and to provide plants with improved micronutrient and water acquisition, pathogen resistance, and a variety of other benefits (Smith & Read, 1997). One of these additional benefits is the amelioration of toxicity in metalliferous soils.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have