Abstract

Second derivative and Fourier self-deconvolution (FSD) are two commonly used techniques to resolve the overlapped component peaks from the often featureless amide I band in Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) curve-fitting approach for protein secondary structural analysis. Yet, the reliability of these two techniques is greatly affected by the omnipresent water vapor in the atmosphere. Several criteria are currently in use as quality controls to ensure the protein absorption spectrum is negligibly affected by water vapor interference. In this study, through a second derivative study of liquid water, we first argue that the previously established criteria cannot guarantee a reliable evaluation of water vapor interference due to a phenomenon that we refer to as sample’s absorbance-dependent water vapor interference. Then, through a comparative study of protein and liquid water, we show that a protein absorption spectrum can still be significantly affected by water vapor interference even though it satisfies the established criteria. At last, we propose to use the comparison between the second derivative spectra of protein and liquid water as a new criterion to better evaluate water vapor interference for more reliable second derivative and FSD treatments on the protein amide I band.

Highlights

  • Curve-fitting of the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of a protein in the 1700–1600 cm−1 amide I region is widely used in the quantitative analysis of protein secondary structures [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]

  • We suggest a new criterion that we refer to as a “whole-spectrum” criterion to better evaluate the extent of water vapor interference in the FTIR spectrum to ensure more reliable second derivative or Fourier self-deconvolution (FSD) treatment on the protein amide I band during curve-fitting analysis

  • We challenged the reliability of the established criteria for the evaluation of water vapor interference in protein secondary structural analysis by FTIR spectroscopy through a comparative study of protein and liquid water

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Curve-fitting of the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of a protein in the 1700–1600 cm−1 amide I region is widely used in the quantitative analysis of protein secondary structures [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Regardless of the actual method that one would choose to eliminate water vapor interference, the success of such elimination must be carefully evaluated by some trusted criteria For this purpose, when the pioneers had developed the FTIR curve-fitting approach, they had developed several criteria as quality-controls to ensure that the protein spectrum in the amide I region is negligibly affected by water vapor interference [3,7,20,21,23]. We suggest a new criterion that we refer to as a “whole-spectrum” criterion to better evaluate the extent of water vapor interference in the FTIR spectrum to ensure more reliable second derivative or FSD treatment on the protein amide I band during curve-fitting analysis

Results and Discussion
C: H2O Second Derivative
Materials
Sample Preparation
FTIR Measurement
Conclusions
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call