Abstract

This work revisits the classical concept of electric energy and suggests that the common definition is likely to generate large errors when dealing with nanostructures. For instance, deriving the electrostatic energy in semiconductors using the traditional formula fails at giving the correct electrostatic force between capacitor plates and reveals the existence of an extra contribution to the standard electrostatic energy. This additional energy is found to proceed from the generation of space charge regions which are predicted when combining electrostatics laws with semiconductor statistics, such as for accumulation and inversion layers. On the contrary, no such energy exists when relying on electrostatics only, as for instance when adopting the so-called full depletion approximation. The same holds for charged or neutral insulators that are still consistent with the customary definition, but which are in fact singular cases. In semiconductors, this additional free energy can largely exceed the energy gained by the dipoles, thus becoming the dominant term. Consequently, erroneous electrostatic forces in nanostructure systems such as for MEMS and NEMS as well as incorrect energy calculations are expected using the standard definition. This unexpected result clearly asks for a generalization of electrostatic energy in matter in order to reconcile basic concepts and to prevent flawed force evaluation in nanostructures with electrical charges.

Highlights

  • Interpretation of electric energy in conjunction with thermodynamics has been widely investigated, with a special interest for dielectric bodies and ideal conductors [1,2,3,4,5]

  • The electric energy stored inside of a body can be expressed whether in terms of charges and potentials restricted to the volume of the body [5], or in terms of fields including contributions beyond the physical boundary of the system, see relations (1) and (2) for linear polarisable systems [5]

  • Careful considerations and exhaustive criticisms about the validity of electrostatic energy formulation in conductors and insulators has been addressed in references [1,2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interpretation of electric energy in conjunction with thermodynamics has been widely investigated, with a special interest for dielectric bodies and ideal conductors [1,2,3,4,5]. The integral is limited to the volume of the body containing the charges, and in this sense, relation (1) represents the electric energy of the content of Ω (assuming the system linear). The internal energy of electrical nature is expected to be implicitly contained in (1), which is how Frankl [7] analyzed the free energy stored in the depletion region of a silicon layer. Relation (3) is more general as it gives the incremental work spent upon creating the electric field in matter and in free space, but without any assumption on the relationship between E and D, i.e. without assuming that the medium is linear. UP can be thought as a transformation of electric energy in some internal energy that belongs to the body This term cancels in ideal conductors since no electric field penetrates inside. To the best of our knowledge, a detailed transfer of electric energy in semiconductors has never been examined so far

Virtual experiment with semiconductor based capacitors
Regular derivation of the total electrostatic energy
Electric work upon electrode displacement: need for a new energy term
The case of a partially depleted semiconductor
The case of neutral and charged insulators
A sufficient condition for the existence of the additional free enerxgy
Computation of the extra energy in non-degenerate silicon
Generalisation to arbitrary geometries
Analysis of the energy transfer process
Derivation of the total electrostatic energy in the semiconductor body
The full depletion approximation in arbitrary geometries
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call