Abstract

Extraction of vegetation information from remotely sensed images has remained a long-term challenge due to the influence of soil background. To reduce this effect, the slope and intercept of the soil line (SL) should be known to calculate SL-related vegetation indices (VIs). These VIs can be used to estimate the biophysical parameters of agricultural crops. However, it is a difficult task to retrieve the SL parameters under the vegetation canopy. A feasible method for retrieving these parameters involves extracting the bottom boundary line in two-dimensional spectral spaces (i.e., red and near-infrared bands). In this study, the slope and intercept of the SL was extracted from Landsat 8 OLI images of a test site in northeastern Germany. Different statistical methods, including the Red-NIRmin method, quantile regression method (using a floating tau with the smallest p-value), and a new approach proposed in this paper using a fixed quantile tau known as the diffuse non-interceptance (DIFN) value, were applied to retrieve the SL parameters. The DIFN value describes the amount of light visible below the canopy that reaches the soil surface. Therefore, this value can be used as a threshold for retrieving the bottom soil line. The simulated SLs were compared with actual ones extracted from ground truth data, as recorded by a handheld spectrometer, and were also compared with the SL retrieved from bare soil pixels of the Landsat 8 image collected after harvest. Subsequently, the SL parameters were used to separately estimate the dry biomasses of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and canola (Brassica napus L.) at the local and field scales using different SL-related vegetation indices. The SL can be retrieved more accurately at the local scale compared with the field scale, and its simulation can be critical in the field due to significant differences from the actual SL. Moreover, the slope and intercept of the simulated SLs found using the floating and fixed quantile tau (slope ≈ 1.1 and intercept ≈ 0.05) show better agreement with the actual SL parameters (slope ≈ 1.2 and intercept ≈ 0.03) in the late growing stages (i.e., end of ripening and senescence stages) of crops. The slope and intercept of the soil line extracted from bare soil pixels of the Landsat 8 OLI data after harvest (slope = 1.3, intercept = 0.03, and R2 = 0.94) are similar to those of the simulated SL. The correlation coefficient (R2) of the simulated SLs are greater than 0.97 during different growing stage and all of the SL parameters are statistically significant (p < 0.05) at the local scale. The results also imply the need for different vegetation indices to best retrieve the crop biomass depending on the growing stage, but relatively small differences in performances were observed in this study.

Highlights

  • In optical remote sensing (RS) for agriculture, extraction of the vegetation canopy information has remained a long-term challenge due to background effects

  • This study addresses the hypothesis that the bottom boundary line of the R-NIR scatter

  • The capability of the three statistical methods in soil line (SL) simulation varies in different crop growth stages because the bottom lines change through crop growth, and it is difficult to say whether (Red-NIRmin ) or quantile regression is the better approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In optical remote sensing (RS) for agriculture, extraction of the vegetation canopy information has remained a long-term challenge due to background effects. Baret et al (1993) [1] acquired important information related to this subject by creating the so-called soil line (SL). Soil reflectance varies with time and place depending on many factors, such as the soil type [2], soil physical and chemical properties, soil moisture [3], soil mineral composition (i.e., inorganic matter or ash content), soil texture [4], surface roughness [5] and vegetation residuals [1]. Mineral soil components usually increase the reflectance from the visible to the shortwave infrared wavelengths. Organic matter might indirectly disturb the spectral response of soil based on its structure [2,6,7,8,9]. Increasing soil moisture decreases the reflectance intensity [9]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.