Abstract

AbstractThe execution of hydraulic models at large spatial scales has yielded a step change in our understanding of flood risk. Yet their necessary simplification through the use of coarsened terrain data results in an artificially smooth digital elevation model with diminished representation of flood defense structures. Current approaches in dealing with this, if anything is done at all, involve either employing incomplete inventories of flood defense information or making largely unsubstantiated assumptions about defense locations and standards based on socioeconomic data. Here, we introduce a novel solution for application at scale. The geomorphometric characteristics of defense structures are sampled, and these are fed into a probabilistic algorithm to identify hydraulically relevant features in the source digital elevation model. The elevation of these features is then preserved during the grid coarsening process. The method was shown to compare favorably to surveyed U.S. levee crest heights. When incorporated into a continental‐scale hydrodynamic model based on LISFLOOD‐FP and compared to local flood models in Iowa (USA), median correspondence was 69% for high‐frequency floods and 80% for low‐frequency floods, approaching the error inherent in quantifying extreme flows. However, improvements versus a model with no defenses were muted, and risk‐based deviations between the local and continental models were large. When simulating an event on the Po River (Italy), built and tested with higher quality data, the method outperformed both undefended and even engineering‐grade models. As such, particularly when employed alongside model components of commensurate quality, the method here generates improved‐accuracy simulations of flood inundation.

Highlights

  • The last decade has seen a revolution in the field of flood inundation modelling.Historically, hydraulicians have focused on custom-building local models of individual river reaches, but the dual effect of enhanced computational capacity and the advent of “big data”have expanded the size of model domains considered to entire regions, continents and even the globe (Dottori et al, 2016; Sampson et al, 2015; Wilson et al, 2007; Wing et al, 2017; Winsemius et al, 2013; Yamazaki et al, 2011)

  • The algorithm was executed across the entire contiguous US at 1⁄3 arc sec (~10 m) resolution, at 1⁄9 arc sec (~3 m) resolution where available in the US, and over the Po floodplain at 1⁄9 arc sec (~3 m) resolution to produce new “defended” 1 arc sec (~30 m) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for the US and the Po

  • When validated against the California Levee Database, crest heights were underestimated by the defended

Read more

Summary

Key Points:

Flood defense representation is presently poor in large-scale flood models, impairing their ability to map flood hazard accurately. A new method is presented which automatically identifies hydraulic structures in terrain data and accurately preserves their elevations. Hydraulic simulations where lack of defense data is the dominant error show significant improvements in skill when incorporating this method

Introduction
Data and Methods
Results and Discussion
Levee crest elevation validation
Elevation model building and parameterization
Statewide model comparison
Urban model comparison
Qualitative examination of levee overtopping
Validation against high water marks
Validation against river gauge data
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call