Abstract

This paper investigates the consistency definition and the weight-deriving method for additive interval fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) using a particular characterization based on logarithms. In a recently published paper, a new approach with a parameter is developed to obtain priority weights from fuzzy preference relations (FPRs), then a new consistency definition for the additive IFPRs is defined, and finally linear programming models for deriving interval weights from consistent and inconsistent IFPRs are proposed. However, the discussion of the parameter value is not adequate and the weights obtained by the linear models for inconsistent IFPRs are dependent on alternative labels and not robust to permutations of the decision makers’ judgments. In this paper, we first investigate the value of the parameter more thoroughly and give the closed form solution for the parameter. Then, we design a numerical example to illustrate the drawback of the linear models. Finally, we construct a linear model to derive interval weights from IFPRs based on the additive transitivity based consistency definition. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we compare our method to the existing method on three numerical examples. The results show that our method performs better on both consistent and inconsistent IFPRs.

Highlights

  • Since its introduction, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [1] method has been widely used in many applications and intensively studied by lots of researchers [2]

  • This paper investigates the consistency definition and the weight-deriving method for additive interval fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) using a particular characterization based on logarithms

  • (2) We illustrate that the rankings derived by the method in [19] from inconsistent IFPRs are not robust to permutations of DMs’ judgments and rank reversal problem may arise when the alternatives are relabeled by numerical example

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [1] method has been widely used in many applications and intensively studied by lots of researchers [2]. AHP derives priority weights from pairwise reciprocal matrix. FPR which introduces fuzzy thoughts and methods into pairwise comparison is an important extension of AHP. The studies of FPR [17,18,19,20] mainly focus on the consistency issues and the derivation of priority weights. In FPR, the decision-makers (DMs) assign a real number between 0 and 1 to represent the degree of a preference relation. In some circumstances, the DMs would choose an interval number rather than a crisp value to represent preferences due to the uncertainty or lack of information

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call