Abstract

This chapter studies the consequences of the FDG approach to constituent ordering for the typology of constituent orders at the clausal level. After introducing the theoretical framework, it is argued that the fact that FDG in its dynamic approach to constituent ordering uses four absolute positions, which may be expanded with relative positions, leads to a situation in which each surface order in classical constituent order typology, such as VSO, SVO, etc. actually corresponds to 14 logically possible underlying orders. The chapter explores the consequences of this approach by comparing three V-medial and three V-initial languages, showing that each of these corresponds to a different type in the new approach advocated in this chapter.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.