Abstract

We introduce a new formulation of the real-spectral-triple formalism in non-commutative geometry (NCG): we explain its mathematical advantages and its success in capturing the structure of the standard model of particle physics. The idea, in brief, is to represent A (the algebra of differential forms on some possibly-noncommutative space) on H (the Hilbert space of spinors on that space); and to reinterpret this representation as a simple super-algebra B = A ⊕ H with even part A and odd part H. B is the fundamental object in our approach: we show that (nearly) all of the basic axioms and assumptions of the traditional real-spectral-triple formalism of NCG are elegantly recovered from the simple requirement that B should be a differential graded ∗-algebra (or “∗-DGA”). Moreover, this requirement also yields other, new, geometrical constraints. When we apply our formalism to the NCG traditionally used to describe the standard model of particle physics, we find that these new constraints are physically meaningful and phenomenologically correct. In particular, these new constraints provide a novel interpretation of electroweak symmetry breaking that is geometric rather than dynamical. This formalism is more restrictive than effective field theory, and so explains more about the observed structure of the standard model, and offers more guidance about physics beyond the standard model.

Highlights

  • We introduce a new formulation of the real-spectral-triple formalism in noncommutative geometry (NCG): we explain its mathematical advantages and its success in capturing the structure of the standard model of particle physics

  • When we apply our formalism to the NCG traditionally used to describe the standard model of particle physics, we find that these new constraints are physically meaningful and phenomenologically correct

  • When we apply our formalism to the spectral triple traditionally used to describe the geometry of the standard model of particle physics, we find that these new constraints are physically meaningful and phenomenologically correct

Read more

Summary

Application to NCG

In the previous section we explained, in general terms, how to extend Eilenberg’s approach: from representing algebras to representing ∗-DGAs. our goal is to describe a simple type of Eilenberg ∗-DGA B = A ⊕ H: first, given a ∗-algebra A (the “algebra of coordinates”), we define A as the universal ∗-algebra of differential forms over A; and to complete the definition of B, we take H to be the simplest possible non-trivially graded space — a space with just two components H = HL ⊕ HR — and follow this idea where it leads.

Comparison with traditional NCG formalism
Application to the standard model
Applying the new constraint
Discussion
The graded Leibniz rule
Properties of graded involutions
Graded tensor product conventions and definitions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.