Abstract

Two existing double-difference (DD) methods, using either a 3rdSensor or Radiative Transfer Modeling (RTM) as a transfer, are applicable primarily for limited regions and channels, and, thus critical in capturing inter-sensor calibration radiometric bias features. A supplementary method is also desirable for estimating inter-sensor calibration biases at the window and lower sounding channels where the DD methods have non-negligible errors. In this study, using the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) and Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS)-1 (alias NOAA-20) as an example, we present a new inter-sensor bias statistical method by calculating 32-day averaged differences (32D-AD) of radiometric measurements between the same instrument onboard two satellites. In the new method, a quality control (QC) scheme using one-sigma (for radiance difference), or two-sigma (for radiance) thresholds are established to remove outliers that are significantly affected by diurnal biases within the 32-day temporal coverage. The performance of the method is assessed by applying it to estimate inter-sensor calibration radiometric biases for four instruments onboard SNPP and NOAA-20, i.e., Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS), Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS), Nadir Profiler (NP) within the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS), and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS). Our analyses indicate that the globally-averaged inter-sensor differences using the 32D-AD method agree with those using the existing DD methods for available channels, with margins partially due to remaining diurnal errors. In addition, the new method shows its capability in assessing zonal mean features of inter-sensor calibration biases at upper sounding channels. It also detects the solar intrusion anomaly occurring on NOAA-20 OMPS NP at wavelengths below 300 nm over the Northern Hemisphere. Currently, the new method is being operationally adopted to monitor the long-term trends of (globally-averaged) inter-sensor calibration radiometric biases at all channels for the above sensors in the Integrated Calibration/Validation System (ICVS). It is valuable in demonstrating the quality consistencies of the SDR data at the four instruments between SNPP and NOAA-20 in long-term statistics. The methodology is also applicable for other POES cross-sensor calibration bias assessments with minor changes.

Highlights

  • Since its establishment in October 2010 in the NOAA Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR), the Integrated Calibration/Validation System (ICVS) has provided both Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) and Near Real-Time (NRT) monitoring on the quality of satellite Raw Data Record (RDR), Temperature Data Record (TDR), and Sensor Data Record (SDR) from more than 30 sensors [1]

  • This study develops a new statistical method for inter-sensor calibration radiometric bias assessments by computing 32-day-averaged differences (32D-AD) of Earth-scene radiances within two 16-day global repeating-orbit cycles from the same types of instruments that fly at Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) and NOAA-20 satellites, respectively [17]

  • Over NH, it was found that the solar intrusion can cause an anomaly of up to 4% in the NOAA-20 Nadir Profiler (NP) radiance at the wavelengths below 300 nm as the solar zenith angles are in the range of 58◦ to 88◦ [12]

Read more

Summary

A New 32-Day Average-Difference Method for Calculating

Banghua Yan 1, *, Mitch Goldberg 2 , Xin Jin 3,4 , Ding Liang 3 , Jingfeng Huang 3,4 , Warren Porter 3,4 , Ninghai Sun 3 , Lihang Zhou 5 , Chunhui Pan 6 , Flavio Iturbide-Sanchez 1 , Quanhua Liu 1 and Kun Zhang 3. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Science Systems and Applications, Inc., 10210 Greenbelt Rd # 600, Lanham, MD 20706, USA

Introduction
Channels Characterizations for Four Instruments
Two DD Methods
Principle of 32D-AD Method
Global
Diurnal Error Sources
Calculation of Inter-Sensor Calibration Radiometric Biases Using the
December
Application to Observations from SNPP and NOAA-20 Instruments within
January
OMPS NP
16. Comparison of the SNPP andSNPP
TEBs from
Some Discussions about 32D-AD Method
Findings
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call