Abstract
This study offers a comprehensive analysis of the perceptions regarding the gaps in traffic injury laws and the level of judicial security in Ecuador. By employing a neutrosophic approach, which incorporates degrees of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity, the study synthesizes data from legal professionals to assess the need for legislative reform. The use of the Indeterminate Likert Scale and the Triple Refined Indeterminate Neutrosophic Sets (TRINS) enriches the evaluation of nuanced opinions on traffic injuries that result in minimal disability. The resulting insights reveal a significant recognition of the inadequacies within the current legal framework and highlight a societal demand for enhanced legal measures and improved trust in judicial processes. This study underscores the urgency for legal reforms that would bridge the current legislative voids, ensuring justice and protection for traffic injury victims, thereby strengthening the legal system’s accountability and public confidence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
