Abstract

An alarming number of traffic-related deaths occur each year on European roads alone. Figures reveal that the vast majority of road-traffic accidents are caused by drivers themselves, and so further improvements in road safety require developments in driver training and rehabilitation. This study evaluated a novel approach to driver rehabilitation–specifically, empathy induction as a means of changing attitudes towards risky driving. To assess the effectiveness of this method, the present study employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare brain function before and after a short program of empathy induction in 27 drivers whose licenses had been revoked after serious traffic offences (rehabilitated drivers [RDs]). In an extension of our previous research, we first assessed whether neural responses to empathy-eliciting social stimuli changed in these RDs. In order to isolate the neurophysiological effects of empathy induction from any other potential influences, we compared these RDs to a sample of 27 age-, handedness- and driving experience-matched control drivers (CDs) who had no exposure to the program. We then performed dual-fMRI “hyperscanning” to evaluate whether empathy induction changed brain responses during real-world social interactions among drivers; namely, during co-operative and/or competitive exchanges. Our data reveal that RDs exhibited weaker brain responses to socio-emotional stimuli compared with CDs prior to the program, but this difference was reversed after empathy induction. Moreover, we observed differences between pre- and post-program assessments in patterns of brain responses in RDs elicited during competitive social exchanges, which we interpret to reflect a change in their proclivity to react to the perceived wrong-doing of other road users. Together, these findings suggest that empathy induction is an effective form of driver rehabilitation, and the utility of neuroscientific techniques for evaluating and improving rehabilitation programs.

Highlights

  • The World Health Organisation (WHO) has estimated that the annual number of road traffic deaths is around 1.35 million, becoming the leading killer of people aged 5–29 years

  • The analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted on the proportion of successful token placements achieved by each participant on the interactive Pattern Game (iPG) revealed a main effect of Goal; all players made more successful placements the Co-operation relative to the Competition condition (.87 [±.02] vs .42 [±.01]; F[1,26] = 368.92, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.93)

  • A significant Goal-by-Group interaction (F[1,26] = 17.04, p < .001, ηp2 = .396) revealed that, while control drivers (CDs) and Rehabilitated Drivers (RDs) were successful in the Co-operation condition (.87 [± .02] vs .86 [±.03]), CDs made more hindering token placements compared with RDs in the Competition condition (.49 [± .02] vs .35 [±.02])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has estimated that the annual number of road traffic deaths is around 1.35 million, becoming the leading killer of people aged 5–29 years. In 2017, it reported a reduction of only 20% This decrease demonstrates marked improvement in road safety, it highlights the urgent need for further progress. Figures for specific accidents show that the vast majority are caused by drivers themselves; of all road fatalities in Europe, approximately 30% involve speeding and an additional 25% are alcohol-related. In this light, improving road safety requires the development of more effective techniques for driver training and rehabilitation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call