Abstract
Abstract Nested and simultaneous site choice hypotheses are tested and compared by multinomial logit analysis of travel to urban forest recreation sites in the Chicago metropolitan area. The nested model fits the data better, demonstrates violation of the independence from irrelevant alternatives (IIA) assumption in the simultaneous model, and offers a somewhat different explanation of site choice behavior.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
