Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore how the five presidential aspirants employed rhetoric during the presidential debates held last February 21, 2016, in Cagayan de Oro for the first leg, and April 26, 2016, in Pangasinan for the third leg. The study employed the neo-Aristotelian Approach which is a dominant approach to criticism for examining rhetoric in public speech. In addition, three canons of rhetoric, including invention (ethos, pathos, logos), organization, and style were applied. The findings revealed that the analyses of the five presidential candidates using the three among the five canons of rhetoric, is useful to evaluate their speeches. Ethos is gravely used by most of the presidentiables to persuade their constituent voters. The functions of political speeches in the context of presidential debate were achieved.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
