A necessary reform of agriculture market access rules

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate by text and empirical facts, the need to reform the rules in force.Design/methodology/approachThis study confronts current standards with empirical facts. To do this, it is postulated that even though current market access standards are better that the Gatt 1947 rules, they leave the possibility for some members to hijack them to eventually increase their protection effective tariff.FindingsMarket access standards for agricultural products should be reformed because of their asymmetry. To put an end to this asymmetry, these standards should be rebalanced. This is precisely the challenge of the current multilateral negotiations.Originality/valueUnlike the studies conducted on this subject (to my knowledge), which are mainly based on economic or political science methods, this analysis is essentially based on legal reasoning law.