Abstract
ABSTRACTIreland’s electoral politics have always revolved around Fianna Fáil. While Whyte [Whyte, J. (1974) Ireland: politics without social bases, in: R. Rose (Ed.) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook, pp. 619–657 (New York, NY: The Free Press)] contended that ‘Irish party politics [are] sui generis: the context from which they spring is sui generis’, Garvin [Garvin, T. (1982) Theory, culture and Fianna Fáil: a review, in: M. Kelly, L. O'Dowd & J. Wickham (Eds.) Power, Conflict and Inequality, pp. 171–185 (Dublin: Turoe)] argued that ‘Fianna Fáil is a political formation which has … the power to defy the rather frail taxonomic systems of political scientists’. Political scientists may have been using the wrong comparators: rather than considering Fianna Fáil as a catch-all party it is better understood as a ‘natural governing party’. This article situates Fianna Fáil in terms of the theoretical models that account for the essential nature of political parties and the working of the competitive systems they create; and then uses those insights to compare Fianna Fáil with other dominant centre parties in Italy, Japan, India and Canada. It asks if Fianna Fáil is still the party it once was, and, if changed, with what consequences for our understanding of Irish politics.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
