Abstract

BackgroundOlder Canadians are high users of health care services, however the health care system is not well-designed to meet the complex needs of many older adults. Older persons often look to their primary care practitioners to assess their needs and coordinate their care. The intervention seeks to improve primary care for older persons living with frailty and will be implemented in six primary care clinics in three Canadian provinces. Presently, more than 1.6 million older Canadians are living with frailty, and this is projected to increase to 2.5 million within a decade (Canadian Frailty Network, Frailty Matters, 2020). The model will include frailty screening, an online portal to expedite referrals and improve coordination with community services, and several tools and techniques to support patient and family engagement and shared decision-making. Our project is guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) (Damschroder LJ, et al. Implement Scil, 4, 50, 2009). As others have done, we adapted the CFIR for our work. Our adapted framework combines elements of the socio-ecological model, key concepts from the CFIR, and elements from other implementation science frameworks. Nested within a broader mixed-method implementation study, the focus of this paper is to outline our guiding conceptual framework and qualitative methods protocol.MethodsWe will use the adapted CFIR framework to inform the data we collect and our analytic approach. Our work is divided into three phases: (1) baseline assessment of ‘usual care’; (2) tailoring and implementing a new primary care model; and (3) evaluation. In each of these phases we will engage in qualitative data collection, including clinical observations, focus groups, in-depth interviews and extensive field notes. At each site we will collect data with health care providers, key informants (e.g., executive directors), and rostered patients ≥ 70 years. We will engage in team-based analysis across multiple sites, three provinces and two languages through regular telephone conferences, a comprehensive analysis codebook, leadership from our Qualitative Working Group and a collective appreciation that “science is a team sport” (Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 471, 701-702, 2013).DiscussionOutcomes of this research may be used by other research teams who chose to adapt the CFIR framework to reflect the unique contexts of their work, and clinicians seeking to implement our model, or other models of care for frail older patients in primary care.Trial RegistrationU.S. National Library of Medicine, NCT03442426. Registered 22 February 2018– Retrospectively registered.

Highlights

  • Older Canadians are high users of health care services, the health care system is not welldesigned to meet the complex needs of many older adults

  • Aligning with the review conducted by McCarthy and colleagues [25], we aim to implement an evidence-informed intervention to identify, assess, and support older adults living with frailty

  • We have mapped our data collection and analytic tools onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); this framework and approach will ensure that we capture comprehensive data that truly speaks to the implementation process, and reveals what does, and potentially what does not, render positive changes for frail older adults in primary care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Older Canadians are high users of health care services, the health care system is not welldesigned to meet the complex needs of many older adults. With a total population of nearly 38 million, there are 3.75 million family caregivers, or 10 % of the Canadian population, providing support for older adults with age-related care needs [3]. Many older adults require care from multiple providers across multiple settings, but find this care to be overwhelming, uncoordinated and the health system confusing [2, 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] This can lead to inadequate transfers of information [14], medication errors and other adverse events [15, 16], and poorer outcomes [17] for a population that is already vulnerable

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call