A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.

Dara M Wald,Susan K Jacobson

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093118

Dara M Wald, Susan K Jacobson

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093118

Copy DOI

Journal: PloS one	Publication Date: Apr 15, 2014
Citations: 69	License type: CC BY 4.0

Affiliation: University of Florida, Arizona State University

Abstract

Identifying stakeholder beliefs and attitudes is critical for resolving management conflicts. Debate over outdoor cat management is often described as a conflict between two groups, environmental advocates and animal welfare advocates, but little is known about the variables predicting differences among these critical stakeholder groups. We administered a mail survey to randomly selected stakeholders representing both of these groups (n = 1,596) in Florida, where contention over the management of outdoor cats has been widespread. We used a structural equation model to evaluate stakeholder intention to support non-lethal management. The cognitive hierarchy model predicted that values influenced beliefs, which predicted general and specific attitudes, which in turn, influenced behavioral intentions. We posited that specific attitudes would mediate the effect of general attitudes, beliefs, and values on management support. Model fit statistics suggested that the final model fit the data well (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.062). The final model explained 74% of the variance in management support, and positive attitudes toward lethal management (humaneness) had the largest direct effect on management support. Specific attitudes toward lethal management and general attitudes toward outdoor cats mediated the relationship between positive (p<0.05) and negative cat-related impact beliefs (p<0.05) and support for management. These results supported the specificity hypothesis and the use of the cognitive hierarchy to assess stakeholder intention to support non-lethal cat management. Our findings suggest that stakeholders can simultaneously perceive both positive and negative beliefs about outdoor cats, which influence attitudes toward and support for non-lethal management.

Highlights

Public acceptance of wildlife management is dependent upon complex interactions between individual values, attitudes, beliefs and social interactions[1]
We developed a parsimonious model of the cognitive antecedents of stakeholder conflict over animal management, and used outdoor cats to explore the utility of this model
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) waived the need for written informed consent for the mail surveys because this research involved minimal risk for the participants

Summary

Introduction

Public acceptance of wildlife management is dependent upon complex interactions between individual values, attitudes, beliefs and social interactions[1]. Traditional management approaches for outdoor cats include lethal control, such as trapping followed by euthanasia in an animal shelter. Many animal welfare advocates, opposed to the use of lethal cat control, have strongly advocated for the use of non-lethal management methods, primarily Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR), which requires capture and surgical sterilization of the animal followed by return to the cats’ previous neighborhood or home range. On the other side of this divide are environmental advocates, who view cats as ‘‘exotic’’ animals, and for whom the risks associated with outdoor/feral cats are unacceptable [2,13]. Both groups include stakeholders with diverse perspectives about how to manage, confine, and/or control outdoor cats [14]

Methods

Results

Conclusion