Abstract

The Financial Accounting Standards Board [1977] recently emphasized the importance of forecasted accounting earnings in the formulation of investment decisions. Empirical investigations into various aspects of the investment decision process, such as cost of capital, firm valuation, and the relationship between earnings and stock prices, have utilized forecasted accounting earnings extensively as a measure of earnings expectations. Thus, both policy boards and empirical research support the importance of forecasted accounting earnings. Current sources of these forecasts which are widely available are univariate time-series models and financial analysts. In the future, another may be management forecasts, if the SEC and FASB should desire to make those more widely available. Analysts' and managements' forecasts may be characterized as representing comprehensive models, in that input to these models can incorporate numerous variables both endogenous and exogenous to the firm. In contrast, the univariate timeseries models incorporate a single variable, past earnings. Both comprehensive and univariate models have advantages and disadvantages. Currently, a major question is the value of a comprehensive model relative to a univariate model. Another question is whether a univariate model should be identified individually for each firm or if a generally identified or premier model would provide forecasts that are

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call