Abstract
4137 Background: Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) or NETs (also called “carcinoids”) are problematic since they present with advanced disease and have limited treatment options. Imaging has proved to be insensitive in identifying treatment effect. Similarly, the currently used biomarker, a neurosectory peptide, Chromogranin A (CgA) is of limited value as a predictor of treatment efficacy. We have developed a multi-transcript (n=51 genes) molecular signature for PCR-based blood analysis which exhibits a high sensitivity (85-98%), specificity (93-97%), positive predictive value (95-96%) and negative predictive value (87-98%) for the identification of GEP-NENs. This test significantly outperforms (p<0005) plasma CgA (measured by ELISA). Methods: The candidate gene signature was examined by a 2-step PCR method in a training set of 130 blood samples (GEP-NENs: n=63, treatment-naïve (n=28)) and validated in an independent set ([n=182, GEP-NENs: n=133, including complete remission (n=4), clinically stable disease (n=82) and non-responders/clinically progressive disease (n=47). Results: The PCR score was significantly elevated (p<0.0001) in the treatment-naïve group compared to treated GEP-NENs, while levels were significantly reduced (p<0.004) in 11 matched samples (pre- and post-treatment – surgical removal (n=10), RFA (n=1)). In the independent set, the scores for complete remission were not different to controls (0.5±0.25 vs. 0.4±0.16), while scores for stable disease (0.63±0.12) were significantly lower than for non-responders (5.85±0.34, p<0.002). Stable disease could be differentiated from clinically progressive disease since the latter exhibited a high score (85% vs. 10%, p<0.0001). The performance metrics for differentiation were: sensitivity (91%), specificity (91%), PPV (86%), NPV (95%). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the multi-transcript molecular signature is both sensitive and specific for the detection of neuroendocrine tumor disease and is capable of differentiating clinically stable from progressive disease. It therefore has potential utility as a measure for monitoring treatment efficacy for GEP-NENs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.