Abstract
Neuromodulation can profoundly impact the gain and polarity of postsynaptic changes in Hebbian synaptic plasticity. An emerging pattern observed in multiple central synapses is a pull–push type of control in which activation of receptors coupled to the G-protein Gs promote long-term potentiation (LTP) at the expense of long-term depression (LTD), whereas receptors coupled to Gq promote LTD at the expense of LTP. Notably, coactivation of both Gs- and Gq-coupled receptors enhances the gain of both LTP and LTD. To account for these observations, we propose a simple kinetic model in which AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are trafficked between multiple subcompartments in and around the postsynaptic spine. In the model AMPARs in the postsynaptic density compartment (PSD) are the primary contributors to synaptic conductance. During LTP induction, AMPARs are trafficked to the PSD primarily from a relatively small perisynaptic (peri-PSD) compartment. Gs-coupled receptors promote LTP by replenishing peri-PSD through increased AMPAR exocytosis from a pool of endocytic AMPAR. During LTD induction AMPARs are trafficked in the reverse direction, from the PSD to the peri-PSD compartment, and Gq-coupled receptors promote LTD by clearing the peri-PSD compartment through increased AMPAR endocytosis. We claim that the model not only captures essential features of the pull–push neuromodulation of synaptic plasticity, but it is also consistent with other actions of neuromodulators observed in slice experiments and is compatible with the current understanding of AMPAR trafficking.
Highlights
Organisms learn about their environment from experiences that are rewarding, aversive, or salient
AMPA receptors (AMPARs) in the postsynaptic density compartment (PSD) contribute to the synaptic conductance, and they can be trafficked to and from small peri-PSD compartments (PeriIN, PeriOut), which do not contribute to the synaptic responses
The model features the neuromodulation of a direct exchange between the endocytic compartment and unanchored (UA) freely moving AMPARs, a fraction of which contribute to synaptic responses
Summary
Organisms learn about their environment from experiences that are rewarding, aversive, or salient. Multiple mechanisms for the expression of NMDA-dependent Hebbian plasticity have been identified These include the direct exchange of AMPAR between the synapse and internal compartments via exocytosis in LTP, for example (Lledo et al, 1998; Ahmad et al, 2012; Wu et al, 2017), changes in AMPAR unitary conductance (Park et al, 2021), and lateral diffusion of surface AMPARs and their trapping at postsynaptic density compartment (PSD) site, in case of LTP, and their release from the PSD, in the case of LTD (Oh et al, 2006; Derkach et al, 2007; Makino and Malinow, 2009; Newpher and Ehlers, 2009; Choquet, 2018; Diering and Huganir, 2018). We surmise that the described model captures several essential features of the data observed in the visual cortex and its application could be extended to neuromodulation in other structures
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.