Abstract
Mechanical stimulation can regulate cellular behavior, e.g., differentiation, proliferation, matrix production and mineralization. To apply fluid-induced wall shear stress (WSS) on cells, perfusion bioreactors have been commonly used in tissue engineering experiments. The WSS on cells depends on the nature of the micro-fluidic environment within scaffolds under medium perfusion. Simulating the fluidic environment within scaffolds will be important for gaining a better insight into the actual mechanical stimulation on cells in a tissue engineering experiment. However, biomaterial scaffolds used in tissue engineering experiments typically have highly irregular pore geometries. This complexity in scaffold geometry implies high computational costs for simulating the precise fluidic environment within the scaffolds. In this study, we propose a low-computational cost and feasible technique for quantifying the micro-fluidic environment within the scaffolds, which have highly irregular pore geometries. This technique is based on a multiscale computational fluid dynamics approach. It is demonstrated that this approach can capture the WSS distribution in most regions within the scaffold. Importantly, the central process unit time needed to run the model is considerably low.
Highlights
It is well known that mechanical stimulation can regulate cellular activities
The Pearson correlation coefficient between the wall shear stress (WSS) distributions computed by multiscale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and direct CFD approaches was 0.86
By comparing the average WSS calculated by two approaches at different sub-regions, it was found that the largest difference of the average WSS between two approaches was in region 1 with a percent error of 10.5%
Summary
It is well known that mechanical stimulation can regulate cellular activities This concept is widely explored in bone tissue engineering (BTE) experiments to stimulate cells to form bone tissue. The CFD analysis in such cases is typically limited to analyzing one or more relatively small representative volume elements (RVEs) (Sandino et al 2008; Stops et al 2010; Zhao et al 2017). The accuracy of such analyses will depend on many factors, e.g., homogeneity of the scaffold, prescribed boundary/loading conditions (Hu et al 2018). They found that applying idealized boundary/loading conditions could not capture the real WSS distribution within the global scaffold under perfusion flow (Maes et al 2012)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.