Abstract

Modeling and simulation of gene-regulatory networks (GRNs) has become an important aspect of modern systems biology investigations into mechanisms underlying gene regulation. An important and unsolved problem in this area is the automated inference (reverse-engineering) of dynamic, mechanistic GRN models from time-course gene expression data. The conventional one-stage model inference algorithm determines the values of all model parameters simultaneously. Recently, two-stage algorithms have been proposed to improve the accuracy of the inferred models and the efficiency of the reverse-engineering process. The main objective of this study is to compare the performance of the conventional one-stage and the modern two-stage algorithm, with emphasis on the computational complexity. We explored data generated from artificial and real GRN systems under different experimental conditions and regulatory structure constraints. Our results suggest that the 2-stage approach outperforms the one-stage methods by far in terms of model inference speed without a loss of accuracy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call