Abstract

In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007–2009, the growing body of literature on financial networks has widely documented the predictive power of topological characteristics (e.g., degree centrality measures) to explain the systemic impact or systemic exposure of financial institutions. This study shows that considering alternative topological measures based on local sub-network environment improves our ability to identify systemic institutions. To provide empirical evidence, we apply a two-step procedure. First, we recover network communities (i.e., close-peer environment) on a spillover network of financial institutions. Second, we regress alternative measures of vulnerability (i.e. firm’s losses)on three levels of topological measures: the global level (i.e., firm topological characteristics computed over the whole system), local level (i.e., firm topological characteristics computed over the community to which it belongs), and aggregated level by averaging individual characteristics over the community. The sample includes 46 financial institutions (banks, broker-dealers, and insurance and real-estate companies) listed in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index. Our results confirm the informational content of topological metrics based on a close-peer environment. Such information is different from that embedded in traditional system-wide topological metrics and can help predict distress of financial institutions in times of crisis.

Highlights

  • In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007–2009, the growing body of literature on financial networks has widely documented the predictive power of topological characteristics to explain the systemic impact or systemic exposure of financial institutions

  • In the aftermath of the 2007–2009 financial crisis, which was characterized by isolated shocks to specific financial institutions spreading to the entire system, with the Lehman Brothers default in Autumn 2008 standing out as the most remarkable illustration, it has become crucial to better understand how contagion episodes operate within the financial system

  • We compute topological characteristics at three different levels: (i) the global level, (ii) local level, and (iii) aggregated level by averaging individual characteristics over the community

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007–2009, the growing body of literature on financial networks has widely documented the predictive power of topological characteristics (e.g., degree centrality measures) to explain the systemic impact or systemic exposure of financial institutions. It is possible to predict the systemic risk level of financial institutions out-of-sample based on centrality measures that are computed on the retrieved network structure. It should be noted that, while being different, this approach shares similarities with a related strand of the literature where stock market returns can be used to compute systemic risk measures based on commonalities in the market as a whole (e.g., s­ ee[21] or the PCA analysis i­n16).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call