Abstract

A new definition of the energy, exergy, economic and environmental model (3,4E-Chaiyat models) was used to evaluate cascade air-cooled multigeneration from a single-stage organic Rankine cycle of 10 kWe, a single-stage absorption chiller of 15 kW, and a drying room of 20 kW, respectively. From the study results, a first-law efficiency of 17.23% was found to be higher than a second-law efficiency of 15.13%. According to a life cycle assessment (LCA), a single score of the energy model of approximately 0.0250Pt was lower than that of the exergy model of approximately 0.1223Pt. In the 3E model, a levelized energy cost per life cycle assessment (LEnCA) was approximately 0.0017 USD⋅Pt/kWh2 for an investment cost of 159,729 USD. At the same time, in the 4E model, a levelized exergy cost per life cycle assessment (LExCA) was approximately 0.0414 USD⋅Pt/kWh2, which was lower than that of the water-cooled multigeneration system (approximately 0.0442 USD⋅Pt/kWh2). Thus, the suitable cooling type for the cascade geothermal-multigeneration system used in San Kamphaeng, Thailand, is the air-cooled type.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call