Abstract

To explore a multidomain fusion model of radiomics and deep learning features based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) images to distinguish pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), which could effectively improve the accuracy of diseases diagnosis. This retrospective study included 48 patients with AIP (mean age, 65 ± 12.0years; range, 37-90years) and 64 patients with PDAC patients (mean age, 66 ± 11.3years; range, 32-88years). Three different methods were discussed to identify PDAC and AIP based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images, including the radiomics model (RAD_model), the deep learning model (DL_model), and the multidomain fusion model (MF_model). We also compared the classification results of PET/CT, PET, and CT images in these three models. In addition, we explored the attributes of deep learning abstract features by analyzing the correlation between radiomics and deep learning features. Five-fold cross-validation was used to calculate receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the roc curve (AUC), accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sen), and specificity (Spe) to quantitatively evaluate the performance of different classification models. The experimental results showed that the multidomain fusion model had the best comprehensive performance compared with radiomics and deep learning models, and the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity were 96.4% (95% CI 95.4-97.3%), 90.1% (95% CI 88.7-91.5%), 87.5% (95% CI 84.3-90.6%), and 93.0% (95% CI 90.3-95.6%), respectively. And our study proved that the multimodal features of PET/CT were superior to using either PET or CT features alone. First-order features of radiomics provided valuable complementary information for the deep learning model. The preliminary results of this paper demonstrated that our proposed multidomain fusion model fully exploits the value of radiomics and deep learning features based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images, which provided competitive accuracy for the discrimination of PDAC and AIP.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.