Abstract

(1) Background: The progression of youth rugby union (RU) players towards senior professional levels can be the result of various different constraints. The aim of this study was to examine characteristics that differentiated playing positions and player rankings in an English Premiership RU academy. (2) Methods: Thirty players (mean age = 18.5 ± 2.8 years) were divided by playing positions (forwards = 18, backs = 12) and ranked (one to thirty) by coaches based on their potential to achieve senior professional status. Players were analysed across 32 characteristics from eight overreaching factors based on task, environmental, and performer constraints. MANOVA and ANOVA were used to calculate differences among variables in players’ positions (i.e., forwards vs. backs) and ranks (i.e., top 10 vs. bottom 10), with a Welch’s t-test applied to identify individual differences amongst groups and effect sizes calculated. (3) Results: Large effect sizes were found between groups for socioeconomic, sport activity, anthropometric, physical, and psychological factors. Moreover, environmental and performer constraints differentiated playing positions, whereas task and environmental constraints discriminated player ranks. (4) Conclusion: Present findings showed that playing positions and player ranks can be distinguished according to specific constraints.

Highlights

  • One of the main challenges of youth development in rugby union (RU) is to predict future talents at both professional club and national governing body levels [1]

  • The weaknesses of the talent development (TD) processes in RU are represented by the limited multidimensional examinations of players within the current literature [8,12,13,14], which often do not take into account all the ecological constraints or analyse players’ positions or playing levels [12]

  • This is despite evidence indicating that athletes’ progression is largely affected by a range of factors, such as anthropometric [15], physiological [16,17], psychological [18,19], social identity [20], socioeconomic [21,22], and perceptual-cognitive expertise (PCE) [1,23]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the main challenges of youth development in rugby union (RU) is to predict future talents at both professional club and national governing body levels [1]. The weaknesses of the TD processes in RU are represented by the limited multidimensional examinations of players within the current literature [8,12,13,14], which often do not take into account all the ecological constraints or analyse players’ positions or playing levels [12] This is despite evidence indicating that athletes’ progression is largely affected by a range of factors, such as anthropometric [15], physiological [16,17], psychological [18,19], social identity [20], socioeconomic [21,22], and perceptual-cognitive expertise (PCE) [1,23]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call