Abstract

BackgroundBoth low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intensive occupational therapy (OT) have been recently reported to be clinically beneficial for post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. Based on these reports, we developed an inpatient combination protocol of these two modalities for the treatment of such patients. The aims of this pilot study were to confirm the safety and feasibility of the protocol in a large number of patients from different institutions, and identify predictors of the clinical response to the treatment.MethodsThe study subjects were 204 post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis (mean age at admission 58.5 ± 13.4 years, mean time after stroke 5.0 ± 4.5 years, ± SD) from five institutions in Japan. During 15-day hospitalization, each patient received 22 treatment sessions of 20-min low-frequency rTMS and 120-min intensive OT daily. Low-frequency rTMS of 1 Hz was applied to the contralesional hemisphere over the primary motor area. The intensive OT, consisting of 60-min one-to-one training and 60-min self-exercise, was provided after the application of low-frequency rTMS. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) were performed serially. The physiatrists and occupational therapists involved in this study received training prior to the study to standardize the therapeutic protocol.ResultsAll patients completed the protocol without any adverse effects. The FMA score increased and WMFT log performance time decreased significantly at discharge, relative to the respective values at admission (change in FMA score: median at admission, 47 points; median at discharge, 51 points; p < 0.001. change in WMFT log performance time: median at admission, 3.23; median at discharge, 2.51; p < 0.001). These changes were persistently seen up to 4 weeks after discharge in 79 patients. Linear regression analysis found no significant relationship between baseline parameters and indexes of improvement in motor function.ConclusionsThe 15-day inpatient rTMS plus OT protocol is a safe, feasible, and clinically useful neurorehabilitative intervention for post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. The response to the treatment was not influenced by age or time after stroke onset. The efficacy of the intervention should be confirmed in a randomized controlled study including a control group.

Highlights

  • Both low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intensive occupational therapy (OT) have been recently reported to be clinically beneficial for post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis

  • Intensive occupational therapy (OT), such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) for upper limb hemiparesis has been reported to activate perilesional areas in the lesional hemisphere in chronic stroke [10,11], and intensive OT has been confirmed in a study of a large number of patients to be significantly beneficial [12]

  • The results of the pilot study with a small number of patients showed that the combination treatment of lowfrequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intensive OT was well tolerated by all patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Both low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intensive occupational therapy (OT) have been recently reported to be clinically beneficial for post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis Based on these reports, we developed an inpatient combination protocol of these two modalities for the treatment of such patients. Intensive occupational therapy (OT), such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) for upper limb hemiparesis has been reported to activate perilesional areas in the lesional hemisphere in chronic stroke [10,11], and intensive OT has been confirmed in a study of a large number of patients to be significantly beneficial [12] Based on this background, an inpatient combination protocol of low-frequency rTMS and intensive OT as a therapeutic approach for post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis was developed at our department. The study was designed to identify predictors of the outcome of the intervention on motor function of the affected upper limb, we could not include control subjects in this study based on the intervention design of the study

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call