Abstract

Improvement in workplace safety is dependent upon the active engagement of workforce leaders and designers. The university sector plays a key role in the education of these future leaders, and there is an expectation that safety education in universities will encompass more than just a safe learning environment—that is the nurturing of broader safety attitudes and awareness. However, with the exception of dedicated safety training programs, safety education is often delivered and assessed on an ad-hoc basis and at academic discretion. This is partly due to the absence of a simple tool with which curricula can be evaluated from a safety perspective. In a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with multiple stakeholders (academics, professional organizations, and students) to determine their views on existing safety content in university curricula and on the level of preparedness, from a safety perspective, for workforce entry. University participants came from nursing, mechanical engineering, and education schools at three universities. A simple curriculum evaluative tool was also validated. Results indicated there were divergent views on the level of preparedness for workforce entry both between schools and stakeholder groups. However, the limitations of university curricula were acknowledged. The evaluation tool was shown to provide positive feedback on existing, but previously unacknowledged, safety content and also highlighted areas for future improvement and integration. However, voluntary utilization of the tool was a challenge for busy academics.

Highlights

  • Improvement in workplace safety is often dependent upon the engagement and involvement of workforce leaders and workplace designers

  • Three interviews were conducted with representatives of professional organizations—the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, Australian Education Union, and Engineers Australia

  • Using a multi-stakeholder perspective, we sought to examine the integration of safety content in three key disciplines, perceived effect on work-readiness and to validate a tool which could be used by academic coordinators to identify present, absent, and hidden aspects of the coursework curricula pertaining to workplace safety principles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Improvement in workplace safety is often dependent upon the engagement and involvement of workforce leaders and workplace designers. Their long-term approach and attitude to this issue may be influenced by early exposure to the identification, assessment, and control of workplace hazards as young workers themselves or as part of formal education [1]. Rather than be a formally planned aspect of curricula, safety education is a “hidden curriculum” [4]. This is, at least partly, due to the lack of any such requirement by course accreditation bodies [5,6,7]. There appears to be no curriculum appraisal tool with which

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.